How do you classify yourself? Are you weak or strong? Based on what information do you draw that
conclusion? Why do I ask and why do I care?
We’re weak at times and strong at others.
This isn’t about momentary bouts of weakness or gender- assigned
weaknesses. This is about portrayal and
perception and how we either encourage or discourage portrayals and
perceptions.
Let’s consider terms that are applied to cross dressers and
transgenders that are less than flattering.
In fact certain terms, handles, descriptors and monikers can be down
right insulting. I know that I may be
treading upon thin ice with this post but I’m going to venture out onto the
frozen lake and chance that the ice will hold my weight.
The term “sissy” seems to be a mainstay, a standard menu
item, a moniker that has adhered itself to our type. Webster defines “sissy” as: a) an effeminate
boy or man; b) a timid or cowardly person or c) a little girl. Based on the definition, definitions may be
overrated, are we weak? I will say that it’s not consonant to be accused of
weakness when we are strong enough to admit who we are and to practice who we
are whether on a regular or occasional basis.
Am I wrong? I know many of you. You are strong and your strength defines your
character. In fact, your strength makes those around you stronger. We leverage strength and fortitude for our
collective benefit. So why use a
derogatory term to describe yourself when by your actions such term could not
be farther from the truth?
To take this full circle we can agree that in another
context “Sissy” is a name. We all know
at least one famous actress with that given name. It is also a fleshed out version of “Sis”.
Look, we all have “sissy” moments. I experienced them
approximately a year ago when I vacillated about whether to come out or
continue to hide. Yes I was a “sissy”
then. I will premise that since coming
out, braving the turbulence of being in public enables me to forget those
“sissy” moments. I don’t consider myself
one of those who fears unjustifiably. Every one of us who braved the societal
elements to be who we are, to disregard the pitfalls of cross dressing are no
more sissies than a chicken is a rooster.
Yes, I understand that the “sissy” thing is tied to erotic
fantasies and submissiveness. I do worry
(maybe worry is a strong word) that we paint ourselves with unflattering
graffiti and place ourselves low on the totem pole, last in the pecking order –
classifying ourselves as something below other humans. I’m not trying to tell you what to do. This is your life as certainly as day follows
night. I’m expressing an opinion about
perception and reality.
By putting ourselves in a compromising position we risk
being permanently labeled in a way that does not benefit us, any of us. You are beginning to sense where this is
going. What we do, how we act, what we say, impacts not only you but all of us.
Adversity comes from many directions and it arrives sometimes
unexpectedly. I’d suggest that we not
encourage it to come around or to stick around any longer than necessary. And I would dissuade anyone from inviting
adversity to share your life – be careful what you wish for, you just might get
it!
Take my words for what they are worth. Maybe I’m stirring the pot. The pot needs stirring from time to time. If
my words engender a snippet of reflection then the expenditure of cyber ink was
worth the effort.
No comments:
Post a Comment